Call
Email
Menu

Unpaid Overtime Case Against LHC Group, Inc for Failure to Pay Travel Time

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against LHC Group, Inc. (“LHC”) related to its failure to compensate hourly, non-exempt home health employees for travel time spent traveling from client to client during the same workday. The allegations state that LHC’s hourly home healthcare employees were scheduled and required to visit multiple patients or clients each workday but they were not paid for time spent driving between those patients’ or clients’ residences. The lawsuit alleges that these home health employees were not properly compensated for overtime wages at one-and-one-half times their regular rate of pay for overtime work they performed as a result of the nonpayment of wages for travel time. If you have any questions or would like more information about this unpaid travel time case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Unpaid Overtime Case Against Healthcare Ventures of Ohio / Peregrine Health Services

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against Healthcare Ventures of Ohio, LLC (“HVO”), Peregrine Health Services, Inc. (“Peregrine”), Peregrine Health Services of Columbus, LLC (“Peregrine Columbus”), Peregrine Health Services of Cincinnati, LLC (“Peregrine Cincinnati”), and Peregrine Health Services of Edgerton, LLC (“Peregrine Edgerton”) (collectively “Defendants”) related to their failure to compensate their hourly healthcare employees for overtime pay inclusive of retention bonuses, failure to compensate for interrupted meal breaks, and unlawful deductions that brought employees under the minimum wage. Defendants operated numerous facilities throughout Ohio, including but not limited to Autumn Court, Brookview Healthcare Center, Columbus Alzheimer Care Center, The Convalarium, Cridersville Healthcare Center, Echo Manor, The Gardens at Celina, The Gardens of Paulding, The Gardens at St. Henry, The Gardens at Wapakoneta, Heatherdowns Rehabilitation & Residential Center, McCrea Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Oak Grove Manor, Oak Pavilion Nursing Center, Park View Nursing Center, and Summit’s Trace Healthcare Center. The allegations state that Defendants promised retention bonuses to hourly healthcare employees that, even when given, were not factored into those employees’ regular rate of pay. The allegations further state that Defendants’ hourly healthcare employees’ meal breaks were regularly interrupted by job duties that did not allow them to be completely relieved of their job duties. Finally, the allegations also state that Defendants unlawfully deducted portions of retention bonuses already given to hourly healthcare employees if Defendants decided those employees terminated their own employment prematurely, resulting in those employees being paid during such pay period(s) at a regular rate below minimum wage. The lawsuit alleges that these employees were not properly compensated for overtime wages at one-and-one-half times their regular rate of pay for overtime work they performed. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against Recon Oilfield Service and Triple J Oilfield Services

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against Recon Oilfield Services, Inc. (“Recon”) and Triple J Oilfield Services, LLC (“Triple J”) (collectively “Defendants”) related to their failure to compensate hourly and non-exempt operators, laborers, roustabouts, and potentially other field employees (collectively “operators”) fully for time spent performing work. The allegations include that Defendants did not permit their operators to clock in and out for work but instead paid field employees based on the time that dispatchers recorded. However, dispatchers were allegedly reducing operators’ hours or otherwise not fully recording operators’ hours worked . The lawsuit alleges that these employees were not fully compensated for overtime wages at one-and-one-half times their regular rates of pay for the overtime work they performed. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against Majestic Care and Wise Medical Staffing, Inc. (“Wise”)

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against Majestic Care and Wise Medical Staffing, Inc. (“Wise”) related to their failure to fully and properly pay healthcare employees for all overtime hours worked. The allegations are that Majestic Care requires a meal break deduction from employees’ daily hours worked. The meal break deduction is also applied to employees staffed at Majestic Care facilities by Wise. For all such individuals, a daily, 30-minute meal deduction was taken from their pay even though these healthcare employees were often unable to take an uninterrupted 30-minute meal break. Because of this meal break deduction, it is alleged that Wise (placed at Majestic Care facilities) and Majestic Care’s employees were not fully and properly compensated all overtime wages that they earned. If you have any questions or would like more information about the Wise and Majestic Care unpaid overtime case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Unpaid Overtime Case Against Midas Franchisee Auto Systems Centers, Inc.

Our unpaid overtime lawyers have filed an unpaid overtime case against Midas franchisee Auto Systems Centers, Inc. (“Midas”) related to its failure to compensate its automotive technicians for pre-shift and post-shift job duties as well as interrupted (or shortened) meal breaks which resulted in unpaid overtime for the technicians. The allegations include that Midas required its technicians to arrive at the facility early in order to open the service centers and engage in pre-shift job duties. The allegations further state that Midas’s technicians’ meal breaks were regularly interrupted by job duties, shortened, or not taken at all, but Midas’s managers would clock them out for a full meal period. Lastly, the allegations state Midas’s technicians are required to clock out of work at the end of their shift, or are otherwise manually clocked out by Midas’s managers, and continue job duties and engage in post-shift work such as cleaning, putting equipment away, and closing the service center. The lawsuit alleges that these employees were not properly compensated for overtime wages at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for overtime work they performed. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case, please contact our overtime lawyers for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against Rumpke for Welders’ Interrupted or Missed Meal Breaks

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against Rumpke Transportation Company, LLC (“Rumpke”) related to its failure to compensate hourly welders for missed or interrupted meal breaks, which resulted in unpaid overtime for these employees. The allegations state that Rumpke’s hourly welders’ meal breaks were regularly interrupted or missed because they were busy performing job duties. The lawsuit alleges that these employees were not properly compensated for all overtime wages for all overtime work they performed because of their uncompensated meal breaks. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against KTH Parts Industries

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against KTH Parts Industries (KTH Parts) and KTH Leesburg Products, LLC (KTH Leesburg) related to their failure to pay employees for all overtime hours worked. The allegations include that KTH Parts and KTH Leesburg employees were performed pre-shift work for which they were not compensated. The allegations include that KTH Parts and KTH Leesburg employees did not receive any pay for pre-shift work. If you have any questions or would like more information about the KTH Parts and KTH Leesburg overtime case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Contact Coffman Legal Today

+ =