Call
Email
Menu

Piece Rate Overtime Case Against Forest River RV

Our firm (along with Nilges Draher LLC and Hassler Kondras Miller LLP) has filed an unpaid overtime case for Forest River RV’s “piece rate” production workers related to its alleged failure to fully and properly compensate “piece rate” workers on a “bona fide” piece rate system for all of their overtime wages earned. The lawsuit alleges that Forest River RV has failed to fully and properly compensate its pieceworkers the overtime wages they earned because Forest River’s piece rate pay system improperly included nonproductive work hours in its calculation of piece rate employees’ overtime rates. Moreover, the lawsuit alleges that Forest River also took unlawful wage deductions from its employees’ pay. If you have any questions or would like more information about the Forest River “piece rate” production worker overtime lawsuit, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against Austin Powder Company

Our firm has filed an overtime lawsuit against Austin Powder Company ("APC”) for failure to pay all overtime earned for three reasons. First, we allege that APC employees are not paid all overtime wages because APC maintains an unlawful rounding system that underpays its employees. For instance, APC maintains a policy or practice of prohibiting employees from clocking in more than 7 minutes before the scheduled start of their shift which ensures that employees are not paid for any pre-shift work. Second, APC employees are not paid for missed or interrupted meal breaks that they cannot take without interruptions by work. Third., APC pays employees at 1.5 times their hourly rate of pay and it does not include certain additional pay, such as non-discretionary bonus payments. If you have any questions or would like more information about the unpaid overtime case against Austin Powder Company, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against ContactUS Communications

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against ContactUS, LLC and ContactUS Technology, Ltd. (ContactUS Communications) related to the failure to pay customer service representatives for all overtime hours worked. The allegations include that ContactUS Communications did not pay customer service representatives for time spent troubleshooting computer issues regardless of whether such employees were working in a ContactUS Communications facility or remotely from home. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case against ContactUS Communications, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation. Our experienced overtime lawyers are here to explain the allegations of the case and your rights to overtime wages.

Overtime Lawsuit Against JSW Steel USA Ohio

Our unpaid overtime lawyers have filed an unpaid overtime case against JSW Steel USA Ohio, Inc. (“JSW”) related to its failure to 1) pay for certain work performed outside of employees' scheduled shifts and 2) include non-discretionary production bonuses into their regular rates of pay for purposes of calculating its production employees’ overtime rates of pay. The allegations include that JSW required its production employees to perform work outside of their scheduled shifts for which they were not paid. Further, the allegations state that JSW production employees received non-discretionary bonuses, such as production bonuses, but that JSW did not include these non-discretionary bonuses into their regular rate of pay calculation for determining their overtime rate of pay. The lawsuit alleges that these production employees were not properly and fully compensated for all overtime wages earned for overtime work they performed. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case, please contact our overtime lawyers for a free, confidential consultation.

Overtime Case Against Arrow Senior Living Management, LLC (“Arrow”)

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against Arrow Senior Living Management, LLC (“Arrow”) related to its failure to fully and properly pay healthcare employees for all overtime hours worked. The allegations include that healthcare employees at Arrow required a daily meal deduction even though employees were often unable to take an uninterrupted 30-minute meal break. Additionally, the allegations include that Arrow did not properly calculate its healthcare employees’ regular rates of pay (for purposes of calculating overtime rates) because it did not factor in “sign-on bonuses” and/or other nondiscretionary bonuses for working extra hours or shifts for which healthcare employees were not scheduled to work. Because of Arrow’s meal break deduction and its failure to include all additional remuneration, including nondiscretionary bonuses, in employees’ regular rate of pay calculations, Arrow employees were not fully and properly compensated all overtime wages that they earned. If you have any questions or would like more information about the Arrow unpaid overtime case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Protective Services Officer Overtime Case Against OhioHealth Corporation

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime lawsuit against OhioHealth Corporation (“OhioHealth”) related to its requirement that its Protective Services officers arrive early and gear up and stay late and gear down off the clock, resulting in unpaid overtime for the officers. The allegations state before the officers clocked in for work, OhioHealth required its officers to gear up, which included, but is not limited to, acquiring their firearm from a lockbox, acquiring their taser, obtaining their firearm magazines and magazine holster, obtaining their radio, donning their uniform and vest, and securing their firearms and tools to their uniform. The allegations further state that OhioHealth required its officers to clock out before they can gear down, which consists of removing all of their equipment and storing in the appropriate place. The lawsuit alleges that due to OhioHealth’s requirement that its officers gear up and gear down off the clock, that these employees were not properly compensated for overtime wages at one and half times their regular rate of pay. Moreover, OhioHealth allegedly maintained a rounding policy that ensured that its officers were not paid for pre-shift or post-shift work. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation.

Customer Service Employee Overtime Case Against Quantum Health

Our firm has filed an unpaid overtime case against Quantum Health, Inc. related to the failure to pay customer service employees for all work performed. The allegations include that Quantum Health did not pay customer service employees for computer bootup time, work performed during lunches, and computer shutdown time. If you have any questions or would like more information about this case against Quantum Health, please contact our office for a free, confidential consultation. Our experienced overtime lawyers will gladly explain the allegations of the case and your rights to overtime wages under federal and state laws.

Contact Coffman Legal Today

+ =